The long-running Paul Pressler lawsuit seems to have been settled, thus putting a poorly-fitting cap on a very sordid tale. This story shows us just how deep the rot in evangelicalism goes, though the flocks still warming church pews probably won’t take it nearly as seriously as they should.
Situation Report: The Paul Pressler lawsuit
If anyone causes one of these little ones—those who believe in [Jesus]—to stumble, it would be better for them to have a large millstone hung around their neck and to be drowned in the depths of the sea.
Matthew 18:6
At the very end of 2023, the world learned that the Paul Pressler lawsuit had been settled at long last (archive). This was an extremely embarrassing lawsuit for the Southern Baptist Convention (SBC). It’s one of the sparks that caught journalists’ attention, leading them to uncover and expose the denomination’s huge sex abuse crisis.
(Related: The SBC braces for a long-overdue reckoning.)
This lawsuit began in 2017 when Duane Rollins accused Pressler of raping him many years earlier. At the time, Rollins had been a member of Pressler’s youth group in Houston. This would almost certainly have occurred at the First Baptist Church of Houston (archive), where Pressler served as a deacon and Sunday School teacher. Rollins claimed that Pressler’s alleged abuse destroyed his life by leading him into crime and drug abuse.
In the lawsuit, Rollins also accused others of knowing about the alleged abuse and covering it up for years. These others included the SBC itself and Pressler’s law partner Jared Woodfill. Woodfill was a virulently bigoted politician as well as the former chairman of the Republican Party of Harris County. Evidence strongly suggests (archive) that the accusations against Woodfill, at least, were spot-on.
Later, the court would learn that Woodfill provided a series of young men to be assistants to Pressler. Three of those assistants would later accuse Pressler of abuse. One of them even alleged that Pressler had bragged to him about swimming naked with young boys.
In total, seven other men came forward to make accusations against Pressler. A December 2017 news story calls Pressler’s alleged behavior “the worst kept secret in Houston.”
And making matters completely indefensible, evidence emerged that revealed that First Baptist leaders became aware of Pressler’s misconduct and abuse in 2017 and decided to keep quiet about it to preserve both the denomination’s and the church’s reputations.
Pressler never faced criminal trials for any of the aforementioned. By 2017, the statute of limitations for those alleged crimes had already passed. The civil trial, however, was cruising straight for a February date, and I’m betting Pressler and his SBC cronies weren’t looking forward to it at all.
But that’s over now. Pressler’s legal team figured out a settlement with Rollins.
The settlement Pressler arranged is confidential. It apparently also precludes the possibility of any of Pressler’s alleged victims filing suit against Woodfill.
Everyone, meet Paul Pressler
Scoundrels use wicked methods, they make up evil schemes to destroy the poor with lies, even when the plea of the needy is just.
Isaiah 32:7
Paul Pressler is about 93 years old, having been born in 1930. He has a long and storied life. In the late 1950s, he won election as a state representative in Texas. By the 1970s, he’d become a judge in that same state. He served as a judge until the early 1990s, at which point he retired. By then, he’d become a powerful figure not only in the SBC but also in the Republican Party.
Early on, Pressler was Presbyterian. But in 1978, church leaders removed him from youth ministry over allegations of sex abuse. Only then did Pressler pivot to the SBC, where he quickly found another youth ministry position within the denomination.
In the SBC, Pressler has held a variety of roles. He’s served on their top-ranked Executive Committee (EC) and on their International Mission Board (IMB).
In 2002, Richard Land, then the leader of the denomination’s Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission (ERLC), nominated Pressler for election to the SBC’s First Vice President role. (Like the Sith, the SBC always has two: one to hold power, and one to covet it. Also, Land got himself fired in 2012 for racism [archive].) Land said he was 16 years old when he met Pressler at a regular Bible study for college-bound teens that Pressler ran at the time—which doesn’t sound ominous at all, does it?
If you didn’t know any better, you might consider it strange that Pressler hasn’t held any high-level elected roles within the SBC.
But he’s still a household name in the SBC for another reason entirely: He’s the primary reason why Southern Baptists evolved into the ultra-conservative and fundamentalist lot they are today.
(Related: Before evangelicals and fundamentalists fused together.)
Everyone, meet the Southern Baptist Convention before Paul Pressler mangled it
They profess to know God, but by their actions they deny Him. They are detestable, disobedient, and unfit for any good deed.
Titus 1:16
Back when Paul Pressler first joined the SBC, it looked nothing like it does today. Both liberals and conservatives inhabited its churches. The mother ship observed a relatively hands-off stance regarding today’s culture-war topics. In 1971, SBC members even passed a resolution regarding abortion that was downright liberal-sounding compared to the denomination’s draconian stance today.
(Very related: The dark origins of the evangelical culture war against abortion)
But it was the possibility of female pastors in SBC pulpits that became the straw that broke the progressive SBC camel’s back. Women had begun making some serious inroads in leadership, and the misogynistic good ole boys in SBC leadership didn’t like it one bit.
The United States fought the Civil War over slavery, but some Southerners have sanitized that fact to a mealy-mouthed appeal to “states’ rights.” Similarly, the SBC was poised to fight a civil war over female pastors—though they immediately sanitized that fact to “biblical inerrancy.”
In both cases, we rightly ask: Inerrancy/states’ rights to do what, exactly?
How Paul Pressler mangled the SBC
There are six things that the LORD hates, seven that are detestable to Him: haughty eyes, a lying tongue, hands that shed innocent blood, a heart that devises wicked schemes, feet that run swiftly to evil, a false witness who gives false testimony, and one who stirs up discord among brothers.
Proverbs 6:16-19
Let’s give credit where it’s due. Pressler had a quick mind and an eye for scheming, at least back then. He noticed some serious exploitable loopholes in SBC bylaws. And he figured out how to take advantage of them. He and his fellow ultra-conservatives wanted to force the SBC to adopt inerrancy as a bedrock doctrinal stance. Once inerrancy became the denomination’s idol, its worship would ensure that women would never, ever get near a pulpit again.
(Related: Seduction of the innocent; How inerrancy became the SBC’s idolatrous marker belief.)
Inerrancy is simply one way to interpret the Bible. It holds that everything in the Bible is true and happened just as the Bible tells it. The Bible contains no errors, ever, under this interpretation. Often, inerrancy pairs up with literalism, but not always. For our general purposes here, inerrancy and literalism can be considered near-synonyms. From inerrancy, evangelicals derive all of their most extreme and reality-denying doctrinal stances.
Pressler figured out that if his faction could hold the SBC presidency for a certain number of years, their president could stuff committees and appointed roles with so many inerrancy-addled faction members that they could hijack the entire denomination forever. “He put two and two together,” wrote one sociology professor (archive) of the scheme he devised.
And he pulled it off almost without a hitch.
Nowadays, most folks call this hijack the Conservative Resurgence.
In 2018, Rod Dreher of The American Conservative referred to Pressler and Paige Patterson—a disgraced SBC seminary president fired (mostly) for mishandling sex-assault allegations on his campus—as “the Peter and Paul of the Conservative Resurgence” (archive). He’s not wrong, either (archive).
But Patterson was just a seminary student when he met Pressler in the late 1960s. By contrast, Pressler was a politician and just a couple of years away from becoming a Texas judge. Don’t make any mistakes about who drove their clown car as they campaigned together for years to get Baptists on board with their message.
Paul Pressler isn’t just any Southern Baptist leader mired in scandal, however
So when you, a mere human being, pass judgment on them and yet do the same things, do you think you will escape God’s judgment?
Romans 2:3
By now, most Americans encounter news stories every day about yet another evangelical sex scandal. I have a running not-so-funny-joke with my husband in which I read an evangelical scandal’s headline out to him—but then, I pause before naming the crime. He then guesses what the crime might have been.
Who are we kidding, though? It’s almost always something sex-related. So far, he’s only been wrong once or twice. Really, we’re both relieved if everyone involved in an evangelical scandal is at least of-age.
But Paul Pressler’s scandal isn’t just any regular evangelical sex scandal. He’s a big part of why Southern Baptists are who they are in the modern day. Without him, they would not be the ultra-conservative, hyper-politicized, and breathtakingly-sexist, -racist, and -bigoted denomination that they are now.
There’s no saving or redeeming this mess; it’s rotted from the inside out
Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You are like whitewashed tombs, which look beautiful on the outside but on the inside are full of the bones of the dead and everything unclean.
Matthew 23:27
Evangelicals like to say that fresh water can’t flow from a salt-water spring. That’s from James 3:11. This saying means that evil can’t come from good sources. Likewise, good can’t flow forth from evil sources.
Well, Paul Pressler is the fountain from which flowed the modern-day SBC.
In a very real way, his scandal indicates that the rot in evangelicalism goes to its very roots and its very heart. At every step in his SBC career, leaders at all levels covered for him and enabled him. The leadership structure of the SBC looks like it does and operates as it has for years because Paul Pressler and men like him ran rampant within it. It is custom-designed to serve predators and their perverted purposes.
The SBC began thanks to its founders’ desire to condone and maintain slavery. Even if its start wasn’t rotten, its bylaws and structure were ripe for exploitation by bad actors. The real surprise is that it took so long for someone to notice that fact and take advantage of it.
The SBC is now a power-focused, dysfunctional authoritarian group. Its structure accommodates abuse and enables abusers. It can’t change meaningfully. At every level, it serves untold numbers of bad actors taking advantage of those facts—and protecting their own and their cronies’ interests.
As a result, there’s no saving or redeeming any of it. And that’s kinda ironic, given that Southern Baptists are officially all about both.
24 Comments
Artor · 01/12/2024 at 1:07 PM
“Paul Pressler isn’t just any allegedly-closeted gay Southern Baptist leader, however…”Please don’t conflate pedophiles with gay men. Pressler isn’t gay; he’s a vile predator. Young men were simply a convenient target of opportunity for him.
BensNewLogIn · 01/12/2024 at 1:14 PM
“Paul Pressler isn’t just any allegedly-closeted gay Southern Baptist leader, however.”
I would like to make one small correction here. This is a mistake a lot of writers on religion make.
He isn’t a GAY southern Baptist leader. Using the terminology these assholes with attitudes themselves use, he is a same-sex attracted southern Baptist leader, a homosexual southern Baptist leader, a confused southern Baptist leader, a homo-hating homo of a southern Baptist leader.
But a gay man he is not.
Your otherwise excellent article pretty much describes the problem of the closet, self hatred, conservative religion, and the homo-hating homos that infect and infest so much of conservative religion like the MAGAts that they are. You can call the problem rot, but a better word for it is corruption. In his wonderful Thomas covenant books, Stephen R Donaldson defines corruption as “becoming that which you hate”.
The books are one morality play on the subject of corruption: moral, spiritual, temporal, you name it.
corruption is at the heart of all of the sexual abuse scandals of all of the conservative churches. They are morally corrupt, of course. But the closet is all about corruption. It is a lie, it is based on lies, it encourages people to lie, it insists that people lie and that other people lie to cover up the lies. Because it is all about lies, like all denials of reality, the closet distorts, perverts, twists, and ultimately destroys everything that it touches.
It is why this phrase has become a truism, practically a cliché: every accusation coming from the hyper religious and the hyper conservatives is usually a confession of who they actually are.
My mother used to believe that a sin was only a sin if it was found out. Like every homo hating homo everywhere in history, Pressler’s moral rampages were simply about deflecting attention from himself, controlling others with the illusion that he would be controlling himself, that he would be getting right with his God, who would ignore his corruption, by going on those moral rampages, and a permission to do whatever he wanted to his unwilling victims while never having to question his own holiness.
After all, he was enforcing biblical mandates, enforcing his moral beliefs about everything except himself on people who didn’t share them, although they would probably share his moral beliefs about himself. But that’s why these homo hating homo stay in the closet. They can’t face themselves, they can’t face their imaginary sky daddy, and they certainly can’t face their fellow travelers with the truth.
I have said this many times, and I will probably keep saying it until the day I die. Homo hating Homos are some of the worst people on earth, because they are some of the most corrupt – in Donaldson’s sense — people on earth. They are the reason that gay and trans kids killed themselves. They are the reason that millions of dollars that could actually help other people and make the world a better place are instead spent on stupid political campaigns to exclude gay trans people in society. They are the reason that so much money gets raised. They are the reason that Bridget Ziegler and her husband, ironically but actually named Christian, grifted for power and money on the backs of innocent people while engaging in three ways with another woman that neither of them was married to.
This is the nature of corruption: becoming that which you hate.
Captain Cassidy · 01/12/2024 at 4:38 PM
Well said and thank you.
BensNewLogIn · 01/13/2024 at 12:51 PM
As the Official Only Sky Homosexual Extraordinaire in Residence and Ambassador Plenipotentiary to World of Heterosexuals…
as well as the only white man the Indians trust…
thanks for the compliment, and you are welcome.
Ficino · 01/12/2024 at 1:32 PM
Most of the time, when I see a news report of a scandal, I expect that it will involve a conservative religionist or Republican or both.
One good thing about declining attendance in evangelical churches, which the Captain has identified often, is that less money gets tossed into the offering plate.
Some students of the evangelical church in America think that very many no-longer-church-going evangelicals still consider themselves Christian, AND that many of them are gung-ho for right-wing politics, esp. for Donald Trump. I had thought that as the influence of conservative religion wanes, the power of right-wing politicians to take away other people’s rights and legal entitlements would wane. Right now I’m not sure that effect is happening, though I hope it is.
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/08/us/politics/donald-trump-evangelicals-iowa.html
Authoritarian followers still attracted to dysfunctional authoritarian systems and leaders of same.
Zaqqum · 01/13/2024 at 9:09 AM
Some of these folks might be nones because they left church over political disagreements (the pastor wasn’t MAGA enough) and haven’t yet bothered to find a new church (or, like around where I live, the right wing churches are already run by established cliques). They rationalize this by rejecting in-person church attendance while keeping the rest of the belief system intact, or they consume online church products from big-name megachurches, instaed of personally attending. They aren’t really ‘nones’, but depending on the questions, may show up as such on surveys.
I know that when I left both religion and conservatism, the religion part fell away much faster. Politics is at least rooted in the real world, so it has better sticking power than supernatural beliefs once people start to doubt those. It’s like the difference between demons and Bigfoot–the latter is a creature that could plausibly exist without defying the laws of physics, and thus is easier to believe in. Most folks will be able to keep hold of the conspiracy theories even after giving up on the spiritual warfare aspect of their former belief systems, since some of these have at least a grain of history or truth behind them. Or they can reject things like sacraments and miracles as woo, while still believing racism has some kind of scientific validity, as another example. And when the false belief gives someone personal validation, it’s very hard for them to jettison, if they do at all.
Sadly, I think demographic replacement is most likely to drive electoral change than anything else.
Ficino · 01/14/2024 at 3:42 PM
I have thought that some people who claim to be converts from atheism to conservative Christianity already had conservative political/social views. Edward Feser seems to be one of these. So the change in opinions about religion did not amount to a big upheaval of perspective in those cases.
Zaqqum · 01/14/2024 at 5:47 PM
Absolutely, and (gazes into crystal ball) the next one up for conversion will be Jordan Peterson. His wife has been Catholicized and he seems to have one foot in the confessional door himself. Either way, his political views won’t change a bit.
Robert C · 01/12/2024 at 1:40 PM
Pressler helped birth another disaster Americans will be talking about for a while: Mike “Covenant Eyes” Johnson.
Houndentenor · 01/13/2024 at 10:41 AM
Johnson will be ousted as Speaker before the spring thaw. He’ll barely be a footnote in the history books.
Gwen the Devout, patron saint of atheism · 01/13/2024 at 1:44 AM
The Bible is often confusing and self-contradictory (not surprising, since it’s an anthology of materials, often anonymous or misattributed, spanning thousands of years), but it’s not usually this glaringly incoherent:
“There are six things that the LORD hates, seven that are detestable to Him…”
So, is it six or seven? If the former, which of the seven items listed is “hated” but not “detestable”? The ancient Hebrews weren’t exactly math geniuses (if fundies truly believe in Biblical inerrancy, they must think that π = 3, along with all the many other absurdities that this collection of writings has to offer), but surely even they would have noticed the difficulty with this bit!
Zaqqum · 01/13/2024 at 8:50 AM
It’s probably more of an editing issue than a math issue. Proverbs has plenty of contradictory statements, even within individual proverbs (see 26:4 and 26:5), which can be expected from a book edited over centuries from outside source material by superstitious scribes. I’d guess the first five ‘hates’ are the originals (they all relate to body parts) and the last two are add-ons, including the redundant one about false testimony (possibly the seventh ‘detestable’?).
The idea that all of this was divinely inspired or literally true came later in history, as recently as the last century or two. And the Captain’s article explains how promoting literalism was never the actual point anyway–besides, doubters of that concept would be quickly put in their place if they spoke up to the church. Nowadays they can just leave and find other people to spend Sundays with, or sleep in and watch football. So they did.
jfnavin · 01/23/2024 at 5:11 AM
It’s 7 + 6 plus 13 plus 56 plus many more. It wasn’t meant to be exhaustive. ie. Here are some things He hates. Here are some more.
Say it is full of contradictions, inacurracies, misinformation, lies, etc. What is true, accurate, reliable, anything? What can be found in its pages that we can investigate further that might be very important for us to know? Not one thing? Is it possible God’s Son really did exist? Is it possible He rose from the grave? Is everything written about him lies? What if they got some things right? Say it was embellished big time. If we strip away all of the bull, maybe we can tease out the original.
Is it possible that He did come to teach us about spiritual matters? Could He have been God in the flesh? Why not? Might He have, is it a possibility, that He said something they got right?
Many sayings/words attributed to him are extraordinary. The bible is probably the most influential force in the development of Western Civilization. Who, how, did all the folks who added untrue words/phrases/ideas/quotes whatever, produce a book that is so profound and life changing and unique? Indeed, no one ever spoke like Christ did.
Brian Shanahan · 01/27/2024 at 5:14 AM
The bible’s influence on world affairs has been vastly overstated. For example almost nothing of biblical justice holds true in modern jurisprudence.
Houndentenor · 01/13/2024 at 10:39 AM
I was living in Houston in the early 1990s when I was told about Pressler. Credible accusations had been made about him by young men (teenagers) in the youth group of one large SBC church there. Parents’ of the boys’ friends all believed the allegations. So Pressler left that church and joined the other very large SBC church there. The new church new all about the allegations but were happy to ignore them because he made huge donations. It was always about money and power with this crowd. Tim Alberta in The Kingdom, the Power and the Glory makes it sound like this rot only recently invaded his brand of religion, but that’s a lie. (I’m going to assume Alberta naively believes that. He’s too young to remember what it was like pre-Reagan. Same rot, just better under wraps.) Anyway, this was much discussed around Houston and quite a few people left both of those churches over the way church leadership covered up Pressler’s sexual assaults. Also, about that time, George H.W. Bush had offered a job in his administration to Pressler but that offer was quietly withdrawn. No explanation was given for that decision, but many believe that the background check revealed these allegations and the administration got as far away from him as possible.
All that to say that plenty of higher-ups at the SBC knew all about this all along. Maybe they knew but didn’t believe the accusers. What I didn’t know until this article is that allegations go all the way back to 1978. Given that Pressler was already 48 at that time, it seems likely that there could be even earlier accusations than those, but what this shows us is a pattern and a widespread effort on the part of church leaders in pretty much every denomination to cover up abuse rather than protect the children, teenagers and adults in their congregations. They cared more about power and money than anything else. The SBC just settled out of court. I’m not surprised. A trial would have been brutal. Who knows how many victims would have lined up to testify about Pressler and other incidents that the church not only mishandled but continued to reward the abuser with access to power and influence inside the church. These are the people who think we need their religion to be moral? This is no rational person’s idea of morals or ethics.
Brian Shanahan · 01/27/2024 at 5:22 AM
My guess with the Shrub I administration withdrawing their job offer to Pressler isn’t that they found out about the allegations, but that they found enough evidence to guaratee a conviction if it ever went to trial.
jennny · 01/14/2024 at 4:12 AM
Cas. I kept this quote from The Wartburg Watch and commented on your old P/NR blog that I couldn’t understand how that blogger stayed x-tian when she had to expose so many x-tian leaders’ paedophilia and sexuual abuse. Quote,*Generally, most disgraced preacher types take a minimum of six months before reappearing on the scene; having repented, rebranded, and ready to spread their version of the gospel, having heard directly from the Lord Almighty that His Kingdom cannot prevail without their unique ministry. But (This pastor, exposed as an abuser), is apparently so vital to the growth of the Kingdom that after a mere three weeks since his forced resignation from the Chapel the Lord has opened the door to a new ministry.*
Pressler et al are beyond despicable. Survivors have lives ruined for decades, face mental/physical health issues, suicide attempts, addictions, relationship problems and more. I watched a Rowan Atkinson sketch recently where, as god on judgement day, he diected the sex-abusers over to a ‘tiny guillotine’…..unsaid, but obviously to chop of a certain part of their anatomy….Pacifist that I consider myself to be, I’d personally pull that lever myself on the whole monstrous band of them!
Captain Cassidy · 01/17/2024 at 2:43 AM
I don’t get it either 🙁 This abuse couldn’t exist if a real god of love and justice animated Christianity from the inside. It’s a contradiction to evangelicals’ beliefs in particular.
CheepSk8 · 01/16/2024 at 8:24 PM
I’ve realized that atheists are people who are so concerned with objective truth that they think the truth matters more than the politics. I.e. if we just expose all these pedo-preachers and point out biblical contradictions, churchgoers will realize they’re being taken advantage of.
Then we’re shocked – shocked I tell you! – when the same incentive structures propping up organized religion continue to exist after the truth has been revealed. We’re constantly getting surprised by the realization that most people are in it for the day-to-day social, economic, political, and yes even sexual benefits, and they don’t care about our abstract concerns about being out of touch with reality. Their “truth” is they enjoy being church members, and the systemic victimization of generations of kids can be waved off as an individual failing.
In the third act, most atheists fail to contribute toward competing secular social organizations because (1) we are unpleasant toward one another because we can’t let go of arguments about abstractions we consider truths, and (2) we’re convinced, against all evidence, that religion will collapse on its own when everyone realizes the truth about it.
It’s past time for a new mindset.
Captain Cassidy · 01/17/2024 at 2:47 AM
In the 2010s when all that fuss over Atheism+ was going on, I tried to say something similar. I’m a None, and my general goals in politics and culture mesh pretty well with atheists’ desire for a truly secular government. But the awful anti-woman stuff going around YouTube in particular was seriously off-putting.
I don’t think religion will collapse any time soon. The decline is happening, but it’ll be some centuries, I suspect, for Christianity to die out. It may take even longer than, say, Mithraism, because nothing seems ready to replace it religion-wise.
To me, the truth matters enormously as a basis for my beliefs and cultural/political stances. I’m not naive enough to think everyone shares that position, or even understands how to assess truth claims. There’s still time for us to recover momentum, but not much time, I don’t think.
Brian Shanahan · 01/27/2024 at 5:33 AM
Every single word you just typed is a lie. I’m just wondering if you are lying or simply repeating lies.
jfnavin · 01/23/2024 at 4:24 AM
“But Paul Pressler’s scandal isn’t just any regular evangelical sex scandal. He’s a big part of why Southern Baptists are who they are in the modern day. Without him, they would not be the ultra-conservative, hyper-politicized, and breathtakingly-sexist, -racist, and -bigoted denomination that they are now.”
Anything else? Murderers? Terrorists? Spies? Traitors? Women-haters? Slave owners?
The ultimate legacy of Paul Pressler: the formal enablement of sex abuse in evangelicalism - Roll to Disbelieve · 06/24/2024 at 1:00 AM
[…] written extensively about Paul Pressler’s odious past. So today, I’ll try not to retread well-trod […]
Saving the SBC: Authoritarians vs Love - Roll to Disbelieve · 09/23/2024 at 7:17 PM
[…] addition to insisting they knew nothing, the few Southern Baptist leaders to actually speak about [alleged rapist and sexual predator Paul] Pressler’s abuse usually quickly pivot to also defend Pressler’s “conservative […]