Say whatever you like about Donald Trump. If it’s negative, it’s probably true. But don’t say he doesn’t know how to work a sympathetic crowd. In recent campaign speeches, Trump has been telling his crowds of followers about how he plans to handle immigrants from, presumably, Muslim-dominated countries: he’d keep out those who “don’t like our religion” and “hate America.”
This flatly illegal, completely unconstitutional, human-rights-violating promise appears to have played well to his fanbase, who are overwhelmingly white evangelical Christians who claim to adore the rule of law, the Constitution, and the Bill of Rights. They certainly haven’t rejected him on the basis of that promise! It demonstrates well their priorities amid their religion’s ongoing decline: to defend what turf they can, and grab what temporal power they can before their cultural power fades too much to grab anything with it at all.
Donald Trump and the last screech of white evangelicalism
In his current rallies, Donald Trump looks back on his anti-Muslim travel ban as a “beautiful” and “wonderful” thing, despite the utter chaos it wreaked. He now promises to bring that ban back and institute ideological screenings of all immigrants:
“I will implement strong ideological screening of all immigrants,” the former president vowed. “If you hate America, if you want to abolish Israel, if you don’t like our religion (which a lot of them don’t), if you sympathize with jihadists, then we don’t want you in our country and you are not getting in.”
“Trump Says He’ll Ban Immigrants Who ‘Don’t Like Our Religion’,” Ryan Bort, Rolling Stone
The idea of “ideological screening” should alarm any American who cares about human rights. This is a religion test, which our laws specifically do not allow. But the kind of people who support Donald Trump don’t care. For all their fetishizing of America, its Founding Fathers, its history, and its laws, somehow his fanbase is totally fine with this kind of screening.
I’m not surprised. Donald Trump’s entire existence as a political candidate is predicated entirely on his biggest fanbase’s complete hypocrisy.
Donald Trump is still pandering about ‘our religion’
For months now, Donald Trump has been making the rounds at political rallies. He wants to be president again. That means he needs to raise support in the only real core fanbase he has: white evangelical Christians.
This group comprises somewhere between 5%-35% of Americans depending on who you consult, but they are reliable voters. According to Pew Research, he received 77% of this group’s votes in 2016, then 84% in 2020. Obviously, lots of other sorts of people also voted for him, but they tend to be the understanding sort who don’t mind him pandering so hard to this one group.
In May this year, he went off the rails ranting about immigration. Again. That’s always been a concern for conservatives generally, and white evangelical Christians in particular. Considering their stated beliefs, it’s ironic in the extreme that they’d oppose immigration and despise immigrants like they do. In fact, one 2015 evangelical-run study discovered that 90% of evangelical respondents didn’t base their beliefs about immigration on the Bible at all. (Franklin Graham even drilled down on this exact point in 2017. In response, the Washington Post humiliated him with a Bible study. Other Christians have written similar rebukes.)
Here as elsewhere, evangelicals’ unstated beliefs speak far more loudly than any vocal belief statements they could ever issue. They don’t want a Pastor-in-Chief. No, they want a tribalistic strongman who will prevent more non-Christians from entering the United States, since such immigration only dilutes their numbers and power. They want a ruler who flouts behavioral rules, flaunts his degeneracy and ignorance, and says out loud all the horrific stuff they dare not whisper.
Most of all, they want a ruler who will raise them to the rulership over America that they think they deserve, and one who will punish their enemies until they are strong enough to do it themselves.
As he did almost ten years ago, Donald Trump promises to be that ruler.
When ‘our religion’ is only the religion of a shrinking percentage of Americans
As noted earlier, the percentage of evangelicals in America is very far from a majority. Depending on the definition you use and the authorities and studies you consult, they range from 5% of Americans to 35%. But they vote very reliably. That fact makes them a desirable bloc to own for conservative politicians.
Most desirably of all, they respond extremely well to fearmongering, fake news, and tribalistic jingoism. In their own minds, they’ve got a lot to be afraid of—their own increasing cultural irrelevance most of all.
Christianity itself is cruising quickly toward losing its majority status in America. At present, about 63% of Americans claim Christian affiliation. When Pew Research modeled religious switching in future decades, though, they found that most estimates had that percentage dropping to 35-46% by 2070. Meanwhile, the percentage of “Nones” (the religiously unaffiliated who claim “none of the above” as their religion) only continues to rise. In Pew’s model, they go from 30% currently to 41-52% by 2070.
Add non-Christian immigration to the mix, and white evangelicals become irrelevant even more quickly. So I can easily understand why white evangelicals bitterly oppose immigration, even if it clashes hilariously with their stated beliefs in a literal, inerrant, completely timeless and divine Bible.
Donald Trump knows that white evangelicals don’t want no meltin’ pots
Kristin Kobes du Mez, a brilliant writer whose work I adore, linked evangelicals’ opposition to immigration to “militant masculinity” in 2018. It’s not in me to gainsay her. She’s got a deep understanding of that exact facet of white evangelicalism. As she wrote:
It is incredibly difficult to disrupt a cohesive worldview of this sort, particularly one that is inherently suspicious of opposing views and is fueled by a victimization narrative, one backed by a multi-billion-dollar spiritual-industrial complex, and one that has direct and exclusive avenues of communication to hundreds of millions of eager consumers.
“Understanding White Evangelical Views on Immigration,” Kristin Kobes du Mez, Harvard Divinity Bulletin
I’d just add this: That “cohesive worldview” is not just militantly macho. It also reflects white evangelicals’ increasing sense of tribalism.
In sociology, it is not a good thing for a group to behave in tribalistic ways. Such a group tends to be dysfunctionally authoritarian. That means that it cannot fulfill its own stated goals, nor even protect its own members from in-group abuse. Instead, the group is a conduit for power. Its followers cluster around a chosen charismatic leader who dispenses power to those lower on the power ladder. Those below the leader jockey and infight for favor.
To maintain their hold on power, the leaders of these groups need to flex their power often. They do this in a variety of ways:
- Betraying those who are no longer useful
- Visibly disobeying the group’s rules and allowing favored underlings to disobey them as well
- Painting outsiders to the group as their mortal enemies
- Stomping on critics and apostates with both feet
- Being inconsistent with rule enforcement and creation
- Destroying any heretics’ reputations and relationships as they leave the group
- Making followers do things they don’t want to do, from church chores to abusive sexual favors
(See also: The lessons authoritarians learn.)
But this flexing works best if group members feel they can’t ever leave. If they’re sure they’ll never recover emotionally or financially from such a move, then they’re far less likely to take the risk.
So in a lot of ways, tribalism in Christianity works best in an environment where the local tribe leaders wield a lot of cultural power. If their power gets too diluted, people feel safer in leaving. And the more non-Christians enter the United States, the more diluted white evangelicals—along with their vision of ideal American culture—become in the population as a whole.
The last thing tribalistic white evangelicals want is a melting-pot America. Rather, they desire a solidly Christian America (full of their own preferred kind of Christian, naturally) that turns non-Christians of all kinds into pariahs until they bend the knee.
Compassion and empathy destroy tribalism
Another serious problem evangelicals have with immigration is simply the way that knowing people from the outgroup can destabilize a dysfunctional-authoritarian ingroup. Right now, Trump can frighten his fanbase by identifying Muslim immigrants as terrorists. He can paint them as scary Others who don’t know how to America right.
But once Americans get to know outsiders, they stop being outsiders.
By now, there are about 3.85 million Muslims in the United States, according to a 2023 Pew Research report. In the past 20-ish years, the number of mosques has grown from 1209 to 2769. (And, as they always have, Republicans tend to think they, as a group, face more discrimination than Muslims do.) Muslims are also running for—and winning—public office. They’re far more visible now than they ever were. A 2017 Pew Research survey even found that most Americans were significantly warming up to Muslims, though the war in Israel might now be changing things for the worse.
Still, that visibility has to be scaring the knickers off of white evangelicals. They don’t want to see Muslims praying on their knees on public sidewalks, or to take college classes alongside women in headscarves, or see their kids making friends with Muslim kids.
(I can’t think of evangelicals encountering headscarves without thinking of that cringey side plot from the first “God’s Not Dead” movie involving a young Muslim convert who adores Franklin Graham—who if you’ll recall is very anti-immigration.)
White evangelicals don’t want any reminders that they no longer represent the cultural standard of America, nor are even its Designated Adults. What they want is quiet, effortless mastery and recognized superiority, not having to share and play nicely with the other children on the playground.
Even if it destroys their witness, to use the Christianese, they can’t let go of their tribalism. Jesus’ direct orders be damned! Bible blahblah is all well and good, but this is real life we’re talking about. Like everyone else, white evangelicals know that when real life starts happening, they have to step into the real world to deal with it.
The new age of evangelical power-grabs
Over the past few years, I’ve noticed a sharp change in how white evangelicals present themselves and sell their only product (active membership in their own group).
Just a decade ago, evangelicals tried to engage outsiders in one-sided non-versations. They traveled to schools to deliver sales pitches. They ran pseudo-charity efforts like Beach Reach that were really about indoctrination. Online, they seemed acutely aware that they were selling something. Sure, very few people cared to buy it anymore. But they still felt compelled by Jesus to SELL SELL SELL WITHOUT MERCY.
To an extent, they still do that stuff, yes. But they’ve really shifted their emphasis. Now, they seem much more like an overtly theocratic, totalitarian political group with a thin coat of Jesus frosting. Aware that nobody wants to buy their product on its own merits, they have turned from wheedling and fake non-versations to outright insults and sneers toward those who reject their control-grabs. This behavior seems to bolster their own self-image, even as it wrecks their tribe’s credibility every time they act out.
When I encounter them, I can’t help but think that my first pastor, a genial old Pentecostal leader in our denomination, would have had their hides for mistreating people the way they do.
Again, this is real life we’re talking about, though, not Bible blahblah. Evangelicals may give lip service to Jesus’ sheer power and miracle-working all they like. In the real world, they’re aware that if they don’t punish their enemies, Jesus sure won’t do it for them.
I’ve known this about evangelicals for a long, long time. In a way, I’m glad Trump has come along to unmask them.
I suspect that the further white evangelicals decline in cultural power and credibility, the more and the worse they’ll act out. I just hope the rest of the world is ready to listen when they tell us who they truly are.
28 Comments
ericc · 10/31/2023 at 8:06 AM
𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑦 𝑤𝑎𝑛𝑡 𝑎 𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑐 𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑛𝑔𝑚𝑎𝑛 𝑤ℎ𝑜 𝑤𝑖𝑙𝑙 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑚𝑜𝑟𝑒 𝑛𝑜𝑛-𝐶ℎ𝑟𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑠 𝑓𝑟𝑜𝑚 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑈𝑛𝑖𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑆𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑠
They do want that yes, but I think you are underselling the racism. Religious conservatives aren’t opposed to immigration from central and south American hispanic countries because of their non-Christianness.
It works the other way too; they’ll favor non-Christians so long as they have the right skin tone. 65% of Norwegians are Christian…compared to 88% of Mexicans. If you want more Christians and less nones coming in, the calculus is a no-brainer – and it ain’t Trump’s infamous Norwegians.
Chris Peterson · 10/31/2023 at 10:37 AM
Especially as the number of Christian Americans continues to decline! Pretty much the only Christian churches growing at all in America are those with immigrant members.
Wandering Spider · 10/31/2023 at 12:11 PM
Except by moving here they’d have to give up having a basically functional government and society for…this. That’s hardly a great exchange unless you’re so rich that it doesn’t directly affect you deleteriously and sufficiently amoral that you don’t care about that at all.
Houndentenor · 10/31/2023 at 3:48 PM
Evangelicals were all about segregation until the 1970s when they were losing the last of their court cases. (Some school districts were still segregated up to the mid 1970s!) So they switched to abortion as their big issue. They’d cared little about it (considering it too “Catholic”) until then but Francis Schaeffer talked them into making it their main issue. (See Schaeffer’s son Frank’s book Crazy for God for details.)
Straw · 10/31/2023 at 5:09 PM
You wrote “65% of Norwegians are Christian”, wich is wrong. The correct is that 65% of Norwegians are member og a Christian organisation. Only 35 % of Norwegians identify as Christian. I understand why that can seem strange. People became a member if and when their parents baptised them, and most did until app. 1995. A lot of those people have never bothered to remove their membership when they grew up. Some might not even know a out it.
BensNewLogIn · 10/31/2023 at 11:01 AM
That must be a neck. It’s between his shoulders and his head
Artor · 10/31/2023 at 11:43 AM
No, I think it’s wattles.
ericc · 10/31/2023 at 1:10 PM
Tell me you guys aren’t serious? I feel like an idiot for maybe not getting the joke, but in case you are…this is a tourist wearing a mask.
BensNewLogIn · 10/31/2023 at 10:49 PM
I am no longer serious. I didn’t realize it was a mask on a person. Looking at photos of Donald Trump is not my idea of a good time. I would rather look at photos of Hemorrhoids.
LynnV · 11/01/2023 at 10:49 PM
Whatever it is….GROSS! Along with those squinty pig eyes.
Rick O'Sheikh · 10/31/2023 at 1:05 PM
“𝑩𝒖𝒕 𝒅𝒐𝒏’𝒕 𝒔𝒂𝒚 𝒉𝒆 [Trump] 𝒅𝒐𝒆𝒔𝒏’𝒕 𝒌𝒏𝒐𝒘 𝒉𝒐𝒘 𝒕𝒐 𝒘𝒐𝒓𝒌 𝒂 𝒔𝒚𝒎𝒑𝒂𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒕𝒊𝒄 𝒄𝒓𝒐𝒘𝒅.” Well, I do. That is, I do if you mean that he is able to turn someone who is not already begging to be “worked” into a fervent follower. The follower here is Trump, not the people he supposedly “leads.” They were there long before him, and many of them don’t even like him at all, but since he is pretending to be representing them and their ideas, well why would they reject him? After all, he was the president and could become president again, so who could be better positioned than him to to further their interests? But let him change his tune and stray from “their” way for one minute and they will turn against him as sure as they turned against Pence and others.
Chris Peterson · 11/04/2023 at 9:16 AM
Agreed. Trump is not a skilled or sophisticated manipulator of people at all.
OldManShadow · 10/31/2023 at 2:08 PM
The white Evangelical vision for America is a gated community.
People like them are allowed inside. The HOA is very strict and you must act and dress and think alike.
People who are not like them may be tolerated as hired help.
Chris Peterson · 10/31/2023 at 2:50 PM
As long as they aren’t unionized!
smrnda · 11/01/2023 at 6:20 PM
May be tolerated, but must be out of the gated community by sundown.
democommiescrazierbrother · 11/09/2023 at 3:28 PM
“The white Evangelical vision for America is a gated community.”
Yes. With the OTHER on the other side, except for the sellouts and janissaries that man the walls and fight their wars.
WCB · 11/01/2023 at 3:55 PM
There was just an election in Poland. The right winged PiS lost and a coaltion of center left parties will join a coaltion to undo PiS policies. Young people and women turned out in unprecedented numbers.
With our House of Representitives now run by a religious kook and clowns, obstructionist, incompetent clowns, we may very well see a similar revolt in 2024. Such as already underway in Ohio, and Kansas. Trump won in 2016 because of 88k vote margins in a few swing states.
Seeing the GOP dominated by extremist Christian Nationalists is going to be an issue by November 2024. Turn out will be the key. In the past, turnout among right winged older Americans was a reliable edge for the GOP. But turnout among young voters, especially young women voters may not be low as usual.
Taylor Swift is urging her vast army of Swiftie fans to register to vote. And they are.
LynnV · 11/05/2023 at 4:54 AM
Young women voters post-Roe will likely vote in higher numbers, sure, If they aren’t saddled with too many kids or unwanted pregnancies by then, and have no time to stand in lines for hours to cast a ballot. If they’re not stuck in jobs that won’t give them time off to vote. If they’re still even allowed to vote by then.
I’m afraid I’m not very optimistic at this point.
Manny Guyson · 11/06/2023 at 10:34 PM
I think COVID deaths among Trumpers are an under-reported factor, so ‘right-winged older Americans’ may not be the numerous and reliable voter base they reliably were in the past, another hopeful sign. Their pre-death behavior has unfortunately made me less empathetic to the higher death levels this group inevitably suffers.
Tom Thumb · 11/01/2023 at 10:59 PM
Actually, they DO want a melting pot. The problem is that there is no melting pot. In the early 20th century about 12% of the population was foreign born and it was recognized a halt on immigration was necessary to allow for integration. Thus a 24 year halt on immigration. Now we have that percentage being foreign born again, and assimilation will not happen without another pause on immigration. In fact, the Hispanic population is a majority through much of the southwest and a sort of reverse assimilation is taking place. Take a town of 30,000 people and bring in 1,000 immigrant from Mexico and you get America with an interesting perspective. Bring 30,000 immigrants into that town and you get Mexico.
Chris Peterson · 11/02/2023 at 1:20 AM
Assimilate? What are you, some kind of Borg champion? Assimilate into what, exactly? There is no common American culture, and much of what we have is sick and broken. It is Americans that need to increasingly “assimilate” into the ideals of other parts of the world, not the other way around.
Americans could learn a lot from Mexico.
smrnda · 11/02/2023 at 8:52 PM
A problem with the idea of ‘assimilation’ to me is ‘assimilation into what?’ New England and the US South have both been settled by white, English speaking people for a long time (along with some other groups.) They don’t share a common culture, and if you happen to move to the south (or the reverse) even today, even if your ancestors were in the USA before the civil war you will be seen as outside the local culture, and over time, you may ‘assimilate’ in some ways, though perhaps not in others. How do we know when someone is assimilated anyway? When they watch football? NASCAR?
The US has also had pockets of places that weren’t assimilated and probably aren’t now. There used to be a number of Yiddish language newspapers in NYC. And you can now frequently hear Yiddish spoken by Hasidim in some neighborhoods. A number of cities have longstanding Chinatowns.
I guess I’m just not that bothered by the idea of the US not sharing a common culture, because we kind of never have. I see nothing in terms of an ‘American culture’ worth preserving, because I feel no closer to it than I do the culture of some of the nearby immigrants.
Chris Peterson · 11/02/2023 at 9:03 PM
“Melting pot” is a silly idea, anyway. Take a bunch of colorful crayons and melt them, and you get boring brown. Take some sausage and shrimp and rice and tomatoes and onion and celery and put it all in a blender and you get… yuck. Mix them together and allow them to keep their character and you get… yum!
We are not a melting pot, we are a stew pot!
smrnda · 11/02/2023 at 10:53 PM
I also think it’s a silly idea because the USA, even if you’re looking at supposedly ‘mainstream white people’ or whatever, or people who consider themselves to be ‘just Americans’ is made up of many cultures. People from NYC are different than people from upstate NY. Texas and Wyoming are not the same. The south is different than the north, but you get fairly distinct cultures there, New Orleans is totally not the same place as Atlanta. The country is too big to really share a common culture.
ssj · 11/05/2023 at 3:08 PM
it’s highly amusing when christian nationalists get upset over muslim women wearing hijabs, because many of their european foremothers wore headdresses (wimples, veils, etc.) in medieval times. it was the christian thing to do.
lpetrich · 11/05/2023 at 3:45 PM
Notice how they don’t talk much about how they are the “silent majority”, and how they talk a lot about how the US is “a republic, not a democracy”.
Wandering Spider · 11/08/2023 at 5:36 PM
That was part of what I heard in their whining about losing the abortion rights vote in Ohio yesterday. And good for the voters at least as far as that’s concerned for making the right decision.
Astrin Ymris · 11/28/2023 at 4:30 PM
Semi-OT: According to the YouTube channel ‘MeidasTouch’, fundagelicals are starting to repudiate Trump, as are billionaire donors. He’s losing power, and thus usefulness to them, so they’re beginning to turn away from them.
Sadly, we still have plenty of proto-fascist Republicans without such a tainted brand as Trump, ready to take up the banner of Christian Nationalism and tax cuts for the .1%. Therefore, Trump’s imminent fall from grace isn’t necessarily an unalloyed good thing for Progressives. Still. I’ll take it.